South Carolina
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
349  Anna Todd JR 20:42
981  Kayla Lampe JR 21:32
995  Mary Reiser SO 21:33
1,059  Stephanie Berger JR 21:37
1,332  Christine Kent JR 21:53
1,685  Hannah Giangaspro FR 22:14
1,704  Emily Harding FR 22:15
1,734  Monica York FR 22:17
1,739  Meri Heneage FR 22:17
1,768  Ashley Miller SO 22:20
1,909  Regina Schreiber FR 22:29
2,212  Allie Sprague FR 22:48
2,341  Caitlin Potter FR 22:56
2,369  Helena Harding FR 22:58
2,486  Allie Whitley JR 23:07
2,568  Sarah Falta SO 23:13
2,587  Anna McElrath FR 23:15
2,597  Kaylee Wessel FR 23:15
2,633  Melanie Ng SO 23:19
2,670  Sarah Taylor FR 23:22
2,874  Brandy Wybersky JR 23:43
National Rank #139 of 341
Southeast Region Rank #17 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.5%
Top 20 in Regional 96.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Anna Todd Kayla Lampe Mary Reiser Stephanie Berger Christine Kent Hannah Giangaspro Emily Harding Monica York Meri Heneage Ashley Miller Regina Schreiber
Charlotte Invitational 09/26 1189 21:00 21:30 21:36 21:31 22:02 22:00 22:31 22:44 22:06 22:55
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 1159 20:42 21:26 21:34 21:53 22:08 22:15 21:59 22:28
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1134 20:37 21:32 21:27 21:22 21:59 22:13 22:36 22:08 22:29 21:54 22:28
SEC Championship 10/31 1181 20:44 21:57 21:55 22:06 22:39 22:24 22:29 22:04
Southeast Region Championships 11/14 1159 20:36 21:39 21:55 22:07 21:51 23:12 22:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.8 501 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.6 5.1 8.3 11.2 14.6 14.7 15.0 13.8 9.4 2.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Todd 0.9% 158.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anna Todd 43.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.0
Kayla Lampe 103.5
Mary Reiser 105.6
Stephanie Berger 110.5
Christine Kent 136.0
Hannah Giangaspro 165.2
Emily Harding 166.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.0% 0.0 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.4% 0.4 10
11 1.0% 1.0 11
12 2.6% 2.6 12
13 5.1% 5.1 13
14 8.3% 8.3 14
15 11.2% 11.2 15
16 14.6% 14.6 16
17 14.7% 14.7 17
18 15.0% 15.0 18
19 13.8% 13.8 19
20 9.4% 9.4 20
21 2.9% 2.9 21
22 0.7% 0.7 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 0.0% 0.0 24
25 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0